When the physicists I know discuss physics problems, I understand (as from a great distance) that, to them, physics problems open up unto the wonders of unimaginable galaxies.
I always feel (but usually manage the discretion to overcome), at such privileged-bystander eavesdropping-upon-physicists moments, an impulse to inject inane digressive jokes into these aethereal conversations.
The physicists are patient but slightly annoyed with this. And I feel like an annoying child.
Secretly I must envy physicists their wonderful lofty theoretical treadings of the stars, I guess.
Some years back, at a poetry open mike that I was frequenting at the time, a young man told about taking an astronomy class at the university here. He said that once during the class, a young woman asked the professor, "How high are the stars? I mean, when it rains, do the stars get wet?"
The man at the mike, who was a musician with a guitar, then played and sang a song he'd written, based on the woman's question. It was actually a fairly sweet gentle song, full of dreamy unlikely questions, kind of light and sparkly.
Liking all of this (the cartoon and text that started this and both comments), I'm thinking about a time in the car yesterday driving Jane home from school. She's taking 9th grade physics (which didn't exist in my day) and was describing to Caroline (a former physics/chem jock in what I think was our current lifetime) how she solved some problems posed on exam questions that day. I felt similar to the way Tom describes his social encounters with with physics professors (and managed the discretion not to say anything.) This was never my bailiwick. To me, Caroline looked kind of lost in the envy Tom describes and wistful. Jane just seemed animated by the new treadings. Curtis
Yes, but I love hearing anyone try to decipher a problem that so directly relates to what we are/see/but don't think about accurately.
I wish we had a video of the open mic Lyle talks about.
I am reminded of a Laurie Anderson song/story in which she is sitting next to a woman on an airplane who looks down and sees the lights of cities below and actually thinks they are stars.
Years ago on a night of predicted meteor showers, I scooped up my son and his friend and we drove into the Wisconsin countryside to get away from city lights. I could hear the boys whispering in the back seat, but didn't realize until I turned the car off on a dark country road that my son's friend was terrified that a meteor would crash into us. My son was saying, "...no, no, they burn up in the atmosphere," and his friend kept answering, "You never know."
-
Another cold dark morning, and I had the good fortune to sleep until 6:30,
so I am feeling holidayish, sitting here in front of my little lopsided
Christ...
Of Course
-
… The truth is the whole. Of course, we cannot really see the whole … This
is from Biology Under the Influence: Dialectical Essays on Ecology,
Agriculture,...
Compared to Other Industrial Nations
-
USA, USA, USA, USA, We’re number one. We’re number one. We’re #1 for infant
mortality. We’re #1 for heart and lung diseases. We’re #1 for diabetes and
disa...
Stay away from the pool
-
My mother & I were visiting a friend of hers who was living in an apartment
complex that I regarded at the time as positively palatial, what for the
commun...
In Memory of Ed Ochester, Poet & Editor, RIP
-
We have asked Ed Ochester (above) to edit our Sunday poetry pages for the
next few months. Here is one of Ed's poems: March of the Penguins The
editor of N...
“In spite of all the learned have said ...”
-
Philip Freneau
Philip Freneau (1752-1852) was a journalist and poet in the early years our
country was forming. And, oh, by the way, I once wrote an under...
Balance is important in design
-
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo
ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis Theme natoque penatibus et
magnis dis ...
Proof of Life
-
Um, hello? Is this thing on?
I am writing from the Central Time Zone, as we have officially moved to
Oxford, Mississippi for the academic year! And I have ...
Lana K. W. Austin
-
Lana K. W. Austin’s poems, short stories, and reviews have recently been
featured in *Mid-AmericanReview, Sou’wester, Columbia Journal, Zone 3,
Appalachia...
The translucent veil of life
-
Haha, so the truth comes out. Having 2 children is A LOT more work than 1!
I haven't been able to get out of the rocking chair more than a few
moment...
On the move
-
*Gal about town, photo by Bob Perkoski*
Dear readership,
Your humble hostess has been doing a whole lot of what is depicted in
today's photo: walking aro...
Strawberry Month
-
The strawberry sweets at Lagusta's Luscious this month are insane! I
missed out last year and decided that this year I would take full
advantage.
I luck...
AWP in Minneapolis, and recommended reading
-
Again I've been away from this blog longer than I'd intended. Much busy
with writing, and reading, and life in general.
I'll be attending the annual AWP co...
Remixing the World's Problems Results
-
The one thing about judging poetry is that it often takes me much longer
than I expect. For everyone who has waited so patiently for me to get these
result...
In a Landscape - The Playlist
-
John Cage, “In a Landscape”
Bob Dylan, “My Back Pages”
Neil Young, “Ambulance Blues”
The Twilight Zone Theme
Babylon 5 Theme
Simon & Garfunkel, “Richard Co...
5 comments:
When the physicists I know discuss physics problems, I understand (as from a great distance) that, to them, physics problems open up unto the wonders of unimaginable galaxies.
I always feel (but usually manage the discretion to overcome), at such privileged-bystander eavesdropping-upon-physicists moments, an impulse to inject inane digressive jokes into these aethereal conversations.
The physicists are patient but slightly annoyed with this. And I feel like an annoying child.
Secretly I must envy physicists their wonderful lofty theoretical treadings of the stars, I guess.
Some years back, at a poetry open mike that I was frequenting at the time, a young man told about taking an astronomy class at the university here. He said that once during the class, a young woman asked the professor, "How high are the stars? I mean, when it rains, do the stars get wet?"
The man at the mike, who was a musician with a guitar, then played and sang a song he'd written, based on the woman's question. It was actually a fairly sweet gentle song, full of dreamy unlikely questions, kind of light and sparkly.
Liking all of this (the cartoon and text that started this and both comments), I'm thinking about a time in the car yesterday driving Jane home from school. She's taking 9th grade physics (which didn't exist in my day) and was describing to Caroline (a former physics/chem jock in what I think was our current lifetime) how she solved some problems posed on exam questions that day. I felt similar to the way Tom describes his social encounters with with physics professors (and managed the discretion not to say anything.) This was never my bailiwick. To me, Caroline looked kind of lost in the envy Tom describes and wistful. Jane just seemed animated by the new treadings. Curtis
Yes, but I love hearing anyone try to decipher a problem that so directly relates to what we are/see/but don't think about accurately.
I wish we had a video of the open mic Lyle talks about.
I am reminded of a Laurie Anderson song/story in which she is sitting next to a woman on an airplane who looks down and sees the lights of cities below and actually thinks they are stars.
Years ago on a night of predicted meteor showers, I scooped up my son and his friend and we drove into the Wisconsin countryside to get away from city lights. I could hear the boys whispering in the back seat, but didn't realize until I turned the car off on a dark country road that my son's friend was terrified that a meteor would crash into us. My son was saying, "...no, no, they burn up in the atmosphere," and his friend kept answering, "You never know."
Post a Comment