That responder on the lower right looks awfully familiar.
Our household posse of furry responders (exterminating angels with muddy paws) have a way of boxing the troll about the ears just a bit, before the final deletion (application of amnesia).
I don't have to worry about trolls at my blog because almost no one reads it. An advantage of anonymity. Like an advantage of proledom: you needn't worry about conforming to correct bourgeois deportment at all times.
A dictator may have a lot of fun, but he always has to worry about some treacherous minion garotting him while he's feasting on chicken cordon bleu.
It sounds naive to find the existence of blog trolls surprising, but still I do, even after staring various nasty scrawlings in the face. Of all the forms of minor fame one might pursue, blog trolling must be the most minor. Still, a couple of years ago I found myself in conversation with a couple of college students who I like (their parents were friends of ours in college) who passionately defended anonymous/pseudonymous posting in "letters to the editor" columns -- who said that they would never sign their names to their opinions and felt that doing so was unnecessary and somehow wrong. There was no point in continuing the conversation over a pleasant dinner, but I wondered what kind of adults they would become and why their parents didn't step in? Although this isn't the same as blog trolling, these kids are already walking the same paths as the troll and some of them will certainly take his turn-off. I love your drawings also. Curtis
I totally agree with your point here, Curtis. I think there is something about not being willing to stand behind your words that is both wimpy and creepy. I also think it creates a platform for sociopaths. But then sometimes I am not even sure if the trolls are real. I am reminded of those bots that people meet and date on dating sites.
My first lawyer job was as an Assistant District Attorney in Brooklyn. On that job I saw the many terrible things people do to each other. Most of the time, you could make sense of them, but sometimes you couldn't at all. I think your comment about sociopaths is astute. I understand the possible utility of dating sites and have spoken to some acquaintances you have used them, but I'm glad I'm not in that particular market. As for the anonymous comment question, I wrote a short letter to the online newspaper published by my college a couple of weeks ago suggesting that they return to a policy of requiring all correspondents to sign their (real) names to letters. Under their current system, letters like mine could be voted "up" or "down" by the mob. Enough "no" votes and your letter is masked -- literally hidden from view. My letter proved insufficiently popular. I'm really disappointed in those kids, but more so in the faculty and administration who are supposed to guide them. As you may know, Swarthmore was originally a Quaker school and they exploit the Quaker connection whenever and to the extent it suits them. Sending anonymous correspondence is SO un-Quaker. Curtis
-
Alarm went off at 4:30 this morning as we have to bring T's truck out of
town to get a brake-line job, and then he has to bring me home and then
borrow m...
To Be Surrounded
-
… There is a non-countable infinity of ways in which the physical world can
be put together … This is from The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and
Environmen...
Three Working-Class Poems
-
Longing for Power It’s to work, to home, to work, to home, to work to
death. Sunshine deficient, happy deficient, and smile deficient. They die
with a brai...
Human Rights Day Today
-
The Nobel Peace Prize this year went to Narges Mohammadi, 51, of Iran. She
was arrested 13 times, convicted for five and sentenced to a total of 31
years ...
Stay away from the pool
-
My mother & I were visiting a friend of hers who was living in an apartment
complex that I regarded at the time as positively palatial, what for the
commun...
In Memory of Ed Ochester, Poet & Editor, RIP
-
We have asked Ed Ochester (above) to edit our Sunday poetry pages for the
next few months. Here is one of Ed's poems: March of the Penguins The
editor of N...
“In spite of all the learned have said ...”
-
Philip Freneau
Philip Freneau (1752-1852) was a journalist and poet in the early years our
country was forming. And, oh, by the way, I once wrote an under...
Jason Tandon
-
Born in Hartford, CT in 1975, Jason Tandon is the author of four books of
poetry, including *The Actual World*, *Quality of Life*, and *Give Over the
Hec...
Balance is important in design
-
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo
ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis Theme natoque penatibus et
magnis dis ...
Feeding therapy FINALLY!!
-
There is so much to catch up on and yet so little. I have noticed that the
last year has felt like an inward journey and so telling a story hasn’t
fe...
One year gone ...
-
*Meeting Mark Mothersbaugh*
Today marks one year as editor of *Fresh Water *for me. Man-o-man, what a
ride it has been. Despite the intensity of the job, o...
I'm still here
-
Just posting here to let anyone know (whoever is still dropping by from
time to time) that I still haven't disappeared, I've just been spending
time away f...
2015 Mini Gift Guide
-
A mini last-minute gift guide...it's been quite some time since I've
posted. But I love the holidays so much and sharing gifts that I think
would be great ...
In a Landscape - The Playlist
-
John Cage, “In a Landscape”
Bob Dylan, “My Back Pages”
Neil Young, “Ambulance Blues”
The Twilight Zone Theme
Babylon 5 Theme
Simon & Garfunkel, “Richard Co...
5 comments:
That responder on the lower right looks awfully familiar.
Our household posse of furry responders (exterminating angels with muddy paws) have a way of boxing the troll about the ears just a bit, before the final deletion (application of amnesia).
A tad cruel maybe, but it's nature's way.
I don't have to worry about trolls at my blog because almost no one reads it. An advantage of anonymity. Like an advantage of proledom: you needn't worry about conforming to correct bourgeois deportment at all times.
A dictator may have a lot of fun, but he always has to worry about some treacherous minion garotting him while he's feasting on chicken cordon bleu.
Your drawings are charming.
It sounds naive to find the existence of blog trolls surprising, but still I do, even after staring various nasty scrawlings in the face. Of all the forms of minor fame one might pursue, blog trolling must be the most minor. Still, a couple of years ago I found myself in conversation with a couple of college students who I like (their parents were friends of ours in college) who passionately defended anonymous/pseudonymous posting in "letters to the editor" columns -- who said that they would never sign their names to their opinions and felt that doing so was unnecessary and somehow wrong. There was no point in continuing the conversation over a pleasant dinner, but I wondered what kind of adults they would become and why their parents didn't step in? Although this isn't the same as blog trolling, these kids are already walking the same paths as the troll and some of them will certainly take his turn-off. I love your drawings also. Curtis
I totally agree with your point here, Curtis. I think there is something about not being willing to stand behind your words that is both wimpy and creepy. I also think it creates a platform for sociopaths.
But then sometimes I am not even sure if the trolls are real.
I am reminded of those bots that people meet and date on dating sites.
My first lawyer job was as an Assistant District Attorney in Brooklyn. On that job I saw the many terrible things people do to each other. Most of the time, you could make sense of them, but sometimes you couldn't at all. I think your comment about sociopaths is astute. I understand the possible utility of dating sites and have spoken to some acquaintances you have used them, but I'm glad I'm not in that particular market. As for the anonymous comment question, I wrote a short letter to the online newspaper published by my college a couple of weeks ago suggesting that they return to a policy of requiring all correspondents to sign their (real) names to letters. Under their current system, letters like mine could be voted "up" or "down" by the mob. Enough "no" votes and your letter is masked -- literally hidden from view. My letter proved insufficiently popular. I'm really disappointed in those kids, but more so in the faculty and administration who are supposed to guide them. As you may know, Swarthmore was originally a Quaker school and they exploit the Quaker connection whenever and to the extent it suits them. Sending anonymous correspondence is SO un-Quaker. Curtis
Post a Comment